Field Trips Anywhere
CHO(HAN)Haejoang
Field Trips Anywhere
CHO(HAN)Haejoang

artificial intelligence, ethics and society 20200208

조한 2020.02.09 12:56 조회수 : 239

closing keynote by gina neff 

Fri 8th, 4:30 pm – 5:30 pm 20200208
Title: From Bad Users and Failed Uses to Responsible Technologies:A Call to Expand the AI Ethics Toolkit
Gina Neff (Oxford Internet Institute, University of Oxford.)https://www.aies-conference.com/2020/invited-talks/#talk3
Gina Neff
Gina Neff
 
 
artificial unintelligence by broussard
 
algorithms of oppressions
 
automating inequality
 
 
 
 
​Chair: TBD
Abstract:

 

Recent advances in artificial intelligence applications have sparked scholarly and public attention to the challenges of the ethical design of technologies. These conversations about ethics have been targeted largely at technology designers and concerned with helping to inform building better and fairer AI tools and technologies. This approach, however, addresses only a small part of the problem of responsible use and will not be adequate for describing or redressing the problems that will arise as more types of AI technologies are more widely used.
Many of the tools being developed today have potentially enormous and historic impacts on how people work, how society organises, stores and distributes information, where and how people interact with one another, and how people’s work is valued and compensated. And yet, our ethical attention has looked at a fairly narrow range of questions about expanding the access to, fairness of, and accountability for existing tools. Instead, I argue that scholars should develop much broader questions of about the reconfiguration of societal power, for which AI technologies form a crucial component.
This talk will argue that AI ethics needs to expand its theoretical and methodological toolkit in order to move away from prioritizing notions of good design that privilege the work of good and ethical technology designers. Instead, using approaches from feminist theory, organization studies, and science and technology, I argue for expanding how we evaluate uses of AI. This approach begins with the assumption of socially informed technological affordances, or “imagined affordances” shaping how people understand and use technologies in practice. It also gives centrality to the power of social institutions for shaping technologies-in-practice.

Short Bio:

Professor Gina Neff is a Senior Research Fellow at the Oxford Internet Institute and the Department of Sociology at the University of Oxford. Science called her book, Self-Tracking, co-authored with Dawn Nafus (MIT Press, 2016), “excellent” and a reviewer in the New York Review of Books said it was “easily the best book I’ve come across on the subject—‘about the tremendous power given to already powerful corporations when people allow companies to peer into their lives through data.’” Her book about the rise of internet industries in New York City, Venture Labor: Work and the Burden of Risk in Innovative Industries (MIT Press, 2012), won the 2013 American Sociological Association’s Communication and Information Technologies Best Book Award. Her next book, Building Information: How teams, companies and industries make new technologies work is co-authored with Carrie Sturts Dossick, with whom she directed the Collaboration, Technology and Organizations Practices Lab at the University of Washington. A leader in the new area of “human-centred data science,” Professor Neff leads a new project on the organizational challenges companies face using AI for decision making.
She holds a Ph.D. in sociology from Columbia University, where she is a faculty affiliate at the Center on Organizational Innovation. Professor Neff has had fellowships at the British Academy, the Institute for Advanced Study and Princeton University’s Center for Information Technology Policy. Her writing for the general public appears in Wired, Slate and The Atlantic, among other outlets. As a member of the University of Oxford’s Innovation Forum, she advises the university’s entrepreneurship policies. She is the responsible technology advisor to GMG Ventures, a venture capital firm investing in digital news, media and entertainment companies. She is a strategic advisor on AI to the Women’s Forum for the Economy & Society and leads the Minderoo Foundation’s working group on responsible AI. She serves the steering committee for the Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism, the advisory board of Data & Society and the academic council for AI Now, and is on the Royal Society’s high-level expert commission on online information.

목록 제목 날짜
236 다 함께 폭력을 몰아내는 춤을 2020.01.25
235 남성 중심 문명 그 이후 (슬기로운 좌파 생활 서평) 2022.02.01
234 우리 동네 중딩과 함께 놀고 배우고 2023.04.22
233 엄기호 애도는 사회의 크기를 결정한다 2022.11.15
232 3/28 추천글 쓰기의 기쁨 2022.03.28
231 정체성의 정치에 대한 논의 2021.08.25
230 오늘의 사자 소학 2022.02.28
229 존엄사에 관한 영화- 잘 죽는다는 것 2022.12.01
228 드라마 작가의 노고 2022.05.30
227 해러웨이 관련 좋은 글 2022.07.13
226 KAIST, 중·고교 ‘온라인 개학’ 지원 나선다 2020.04.07
225 댓글 지면, 어떤 순기능을 하는걸까 2022.02.10
224 사티쉬 쿠마르- 세상은 구하는 것이 아니라 사랑하는 것 2021.09.15
223 좋은 글-"바이러스와 인간, 그리고 권력 2020.04.07
222 돌봄- 영 케어러 2021.09.13
221 영화 세편 2022.06.11
220 [왜냐면] 나! ‘코로나19 바이러스’ / 김정헌 2020.03.17
219 문학이라는 사나운 팔자와의 동거 2022.12.04
218 맘모스 3일째 타운 트롤리 그리고 오래된 관계 file 2022.07.19
217 할머니들의 기후 행동- 동네 공원에서 놀기 2022.02.10
216 기운 나는 30분- 장자의 줌 영어 공부 2022.03.28
215 우리 할머니는 예술가 2022.04.17
214 황윤 감독의 신작 <수라> 관객이 만드는 시사회 2023.04.22
213 도서관 연합회 길위의 인문학 마무리 특강 file 2022.12.01
212 고나 그림 -캠브릿지 걷던 길 2021.11.02
211 트럼프지지자들이 리버럴을 미워하는 이유 2020.02.18
210 80,75,71세 노인들의 음악 세션 file 2019.07.28
209 AI 시대 문해력 ppt 수정 file 2022.10.04
208 In this life-Israel Kamakawiwo'ole 2020.02.05
207 한나 아렌트 정치와 법의 관계 2021.08.06
206 팬데믹 3년이 남긴 질문: 교육공간 (작은 것이 아름답다 원고) file 2022.05.16
205 고래가 지나가는 곳에서 file 2020.01.27
204 협동 번식과 모계사회 2022.01.01
203 3/28 아침 독서 한겨레 21 창간 28돌 기념 특별본 2022.03.28
202 영화 마션 2015년도 작품 2021.12.26
201 십개월의 미래, 카오스 코스모스 그리고 모계사회 2022.01.01
200 폭군 아버지, 히스테리 엄마 책소개 2022.03.05
199 우리 동네 어록 : 잡초는 없다 2022.04.18
198 11/9 라이프 3.0 인문학 인트로 file 2019.11.26
197 한 강의 글/시편 2024.02.15