Field Trips Anywhere
CHO(HAN)Haejoang
Field Trips Anywhere
CHO(HAN)Haejoang

artificial intelligence, ethics and society 20200208

조한 2020.02.09 12:56 조회수 : 1267

closing keynote by gina neff 

Fri 8th, 4:30 pm – 5:30 pm 20200208
Title: From Bad Users and Failed Uses to Responsible Technologies:A Call to Expand the AI Ethics Toolkit
Gina Neff (Oxford Internet Institute, University of Oxford.)https://www.aies-conference.com/2020/invited-talks/#talk3
Gina Neff
Gina Neff
 
 
artificial unintelligence by broussard
 
algorithms of oppressions
 
automating inequality
 
 
 
 
​Chair: TBD
Abstract:

 

Recent advances in artificial intelligence applications have sparked scholarly and public attention to the challenges of the ethical design of technologies. These conversations about ethics have been targeted largely at technology designers and concerned with helping to inform building better and fairer AI tools and technologies. This approach, however, addresses only a small part of the problem of responsible use and will not be adequate for describing or redressing the problems that will arise as more types of AI technologies are more widely used.
Many of the tools being developed today have potentially enormous and historic impacts on how people work, how society organises, stores and distributes information, where and how people interact with one another, and how people’s work is valued and compensated. And yet, our ethical attention has looked at a fairly narrow range of questions about expanding the access to, fairness of, and accountability for existing tools. Instead, I argue that scholars should develop much broader questions of about the reconfiguration of societal power, for which AI technologies form a crucial component.
This talk will argue that AI ethics needs to expand its theoretical and methodological toolkit in order to move away from prioritizing notions of good design that privilege the work of good and ethical technology designers. Instead, using approaches from feminist theory, organization studies, and science and technology, I argue for expanding how we evaluate uses of AI. This approach begins with the assumption of socially informed technological affordances, or “imagined affordances” shaping how people understand and use technologies in practice. It also gives centrality to the power of social institutions for shaping technologies-in-practice.

Short Bio:

Professor Gina Neff is a Senior Research Fellow at the Oxford Internet Institute and the Department of Sociology at the University of Oxford. Science called her book, Self-Tracking, co-authored with Dawn Nafus (MIT Press, 2016), “excellent” and a reviewer in the New York Review of Books said it was “easily the best book I’ve come across on the subject—‘about the tremendous power given to already powerful corporations when people allow companies to peer into their lives through data.’” Her book about the rise of internet industries in New York City, Venture Labor: Work and the Burden of Risk in Innovative Industries (MIT Press, 2012), won the 2013 American Sociological Association’s Communication and Information Technologies Best Book Award. Her next book, Building Information: How teams, companies and industries make new technologies work is co-authored with Carrie Sturts Dossick, with whom she directed the Collaboration, Technology and Organizations Practices Lab at the University of Washington. A leader in the new area of “human-centred data science,” Professor Neff leads a new project on the organizational challenges companies face using AI for decision making.
She holds a Ph.D. in sociology from Columbia University, where she is a faculty affiliate at the Center on Organizational Innovation. Professor Neff has had fellowships at the British Academy, the Institute for Advanced Study and Princeton University’s Center for Information Technology Policy. Her writing for the general public appears in Wired, Slate and The Atlantic, among other outlets. As a member of the University of Oxford’s Innovation Forum, she advises the university’s entrepreneurship policies. She is the responsible technology advisor to GMG Ventures, a venture capital firm investing in digital news, media and entertainment companies. She is a strategic advisor on AI to the Women’s Forum for the Economy & Society and leads the Minderoo Foundation’s working group on responsible AI. She serves the steering committee for the Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism, the advisory board of Data & Society and the academic council for AI Now, and is on the Royal Society’s high-level expert commission on online information.

목록 제목 날짜
352 포스트 코로나 교육 전환 - 원격수업운영 기준안을 보고 2020.03.28
351 사랑한다면 이제 바꿔야 할 때다 피케티 2021.06.04
350 함께 한 대학 시절 이야기 2019.12.29
349 마을 체육관에서 벌어진 방학 주말 학교 file 2020.01.27
348 DDP 디자인 박물관 기념 강의 발표자료 file 2020.08.15
347 THE GREAT HACK, 더 이상 공정한 선거는 없다 2019.07.27
346 마을 큐레이터 양성 사업 (성북구) file 2021.05.09
345 대한민국 살기좋은 나라.... 2020.09.25
344 광명 자치 대학 개강 특강 file 2020.09.28
343 큰 위기, 작은 소동, 그리고 재난 학교 file 2020.02.28
342 mammoth lakes 고도 적응후 첫 나들이 file 2019.07.26
341 모두가 신이 된 호모데우스의 시대 2019.08.01
340 12/16 청년 모임 강의 file 2021.12.14
339 기후 위기 비상행동 2019년 9월 21일 file 2019.09.22
338 요가 소년이 아침을 깨우다 2021.09.15
337 기후 변화 학교 (표선) file 2020.11.16
336 경향 컬럼 여가부 관련 2020.08.09
335 공정한 입시가 아니라 교육을 바꾸어야 할 때 2019.10.03
334 기본소득 컨퍼런스 발표 초록과 ppt file 2021.04.20
333 다섯편의 영화를 보고 LA에 왔다 2019.07.26
332 좋은 인터뷰 2020.05.20
331 온라인 교육, 준비하지 않은 대학 2020.04.07
330 개교하면 온라인 학습과 실공간 학습을 잘 엮어내야 2020.05.08
329 강릉 <2021 모두를 위한 기후정치> file 2021.11.03
328 다시 서울로 2019.08.18
327 대면 수업 시작, 혼란은 불가피함 2020.05.12
326 운전기사가 보여주는 글로벌 세대 차 file 2019.08.04
325 다시 칼럼 쓰기로 2020.01.20
324 flashmob, 인간이 신이고자 했던 '근대'를 마무리 하는 몸짓 2020.07.22
323 장애가 장애가 아닌 삼달다방 file 2020.04.07
322 마르켈 총리의 코로나 사태 관련 담화 2020.03.20
321 어떤 ‘코로나 서사’를 쓸 것인가 (황정아) 2020.03.07
320 오름의 여왕 따라비에서 file 2019.07.07
319 따뜻한 곳으로 가서 노시오 ! file 2020.01.16
318 11/21 서울 지식이음 포럼 축제 기조강연 file 2019.11.25
317 플라톤 아카데미 발표 개요 1.1 2023.08.15
316 역시 해러웨이 2021.07.30
315 장자의 마음 "나를 믿기로 했다." 빈둥빈둥 2022.02.17
314 20대 남자와 여자의 거리 2021.08.12
313 KBS 시사 기획창 질문지 2020.05.11