Field Trips Anywhere
CHO(HAN)Haejoang
Field Trips Anywhere
CHO(HAN)Haejoang

artificial intelligence, ethics and society 20200208

조한 2020.02.09 12:56 조회수 : 243

closing keynote by gina neff 

Fri 8th, 4:30 pm – 5:30 pm 20200208
Title: From Bad Users and Failed Uses to Responsible Technologies:A Call to Expand the AI Ethics Toolkit
Gina Neff (Oxford Internet Institute, University of Oxford.)https://www.aies-conference.com/2020/invited-talks/#talk3
Gina Neff
Gina Neff
 
 
artificial unintelligence by broussard
 
algorithms of oppressions
 
automating inequality
 
 
 
 
​Chair: TBD
Abstract:

 

Recent advances in artificial intelligence applications have sparked scholarly and public attention to the challenges of the ethical design of technologies. These conversations about ethics have been targeted largely at technology designers and concerned with helping to inform building better and fairer AI tools and technologies. This approach, however, addresses only a small part of the problem of responsible use and will not be adequate for describing or redressing the problems that will arise as more types of AI technologies are more widely used.
Many of the tools being developed today have potentially enormous and historic impacts on how people work, how society organises, stores and distributes information, where and how people interact with one another, and how people’s work is valued and compensated. And yet, our ethical attention has looked at a fairly narrow range of questions about expanding the access to, fairness of, and accountability for existing tools. Instead, I argue that scholars should develop much broader questions of about the reconfiguration of societal power, for which AI technologies form a crucial component.
This talk will argue that AI ethics needs to expand its theoretical and methodological toolkit in order to move away from prioritizing notions of good design that privilege the work of good and ethical technology designers. Instead, using approaches from feminist theory, organization studies, and science and technology, I argue for expanding how we evaluate uses of AI. This approach begins with the assumption of socially informed technological affordances, or “imagined affordances” shaping how people understand and use technologies in practice. It also gives centrality to the power of social institutions for shaping technologies-in-practice.

Short Bio:

Professor Gina Neff is a Senior Research Fellow at the Oxford Internet Institute and the Department of Sociology at the University of Oxford. Science called her book, Self-Tracking, co-authored with Dawn Nafus (MIT Press, 2016), “excellent” and a reviewer in the New York Review of Books said it was “easily the best book I’ve come across on the subject—‘about the tremendous power given to already powerful corporations when people allow companies to peer into their lives through data.’” Her book about the rise of internet industries in New York City, Venture Labor: Work and the Burden of Risk in Innovative Industries (MIT Press, 2012), won the 2013 American Sociological Association’s Communication and Information Technologies Best Book Award. Her next book, Building Information: How teams, companies and industries make new technologies work is co-authored with Carrie Sturts Dossick, with whom she directed the Collaboration, Technology and Organizations Practices Lab at the University of Washington. A leader in the new area of “human-centred data science,” Professor Neff leads a new project on the organizational challenges companies face using AI for decision making.
She holds a Ph.D. in sociology from Columbia University, where she is a faculty affiliate at the Center on Organizational Innovation. Professor Neff has had fellowships at the British Academy, the Institute for Advanced Study and Princeton University’s Center for Information Technology Policy. Her writing for the general public appears in Wired, Slate and The Atlantic, among other outlets. As a member of the University of Oxford’s Innovation Forum, she advises the university’s entrepreneurship policies. She is the responsible technology advisor to GMG Ventures, a venture capital firm investing in digital news, media and entertainment companies. She is a strategic advisor on AI to the Women’s Forum for the Economy & Society and leads the Minderoo Foundation’s working group on responsible AI. She serves the steering committee for the Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism, the advisory board of Data & Society and the academic council for AI Now, and is on the Royal Society’s high-level expert commission on online information.

목록 제목 날짜
363 남자도 대단히 달라지고 있다. 2019.08.18
362 동영상 몇개 2019.09.20
361 요즘 활과 자주 만난다 file 2019.09.22
360 기후 위기 비상행동 2019년 9월 21일 file 2019.09.22
359 공정한 입시가 아니라 교육을 바꾸어야 할 때 2019.10.03
358 촛불을 들지 못한 20대들 2019.10.07
357 이바쇼 2019.10.07
356 11/21 서울 지식이음 포럼 축제 기조강연 file 2019.11.25
355 11/9 라이프 3.0 인문학 인트로 file 2019.11.26
354 라이프 3.0 인문학 file 2019.11.26
353 5/22 생애전환과 시대 전환 file 2019.11.26
352 미래국가 전략 구성 포럼 file 2019.11.26
351 일년전 사회학 대회 때 글을 다시 읽게 된다 file 2019.11.26
350 < 활짝 웃어라!- 문화인류학자의 북한이야기> 추천사 2019.12.26
349 새해 맞이 영화 2019.12.29
348 함께 한 대학 시절 이야기 2019.12.29
347 따뜻한 곳으로 가서 노시오 ! file 2020.01.16
346 플렛폼 이코노미 -아마존의 몰락? 홍기빈 2020.01.20
345 다시 칼럼 쓰기로 2020.01.20
344 다 함께 폭력을 몰아내는 춤을 2020.01.25
343 고래가 지나가는 곳에서 file 2020.01.27
342 마을 체육관에서 벌어진 방학 주말 학교 file 2020.01.27
341 달콤한 잠에 빠진 물개 file 2020.01.27
340 기본소득과 기초자산 (사회적 경제연구소) 2020.01.28
339 내가 제일 좋아하는 영화 중 하나 2020.01.28
338 하와이 알로하 2020.02.05
337 In this life-Israel Kamakawiwo'ole 2020.02.05
336 [세상 읽기] 희망은 없다 / 신영전(한대 의대) 2020.02.06
» artificial intelligence, ethics and society 20200208 2020.02.09
334 트럼프지지자들이 리버럴을 미워하는 이유 2020.02.18
333 좋은 소식~ 기후 변화 정부 책임 세계 첫 판결 2020.02.21
332 AI 관련 책 추천 2020.02.21
331 코로나 바이러스 관련 좋은 기사 2020.02.22
330 큰 위기, 작은 소동, 그리고 재난 학교 file 2020.02.28
329 [슬로워크・빠띠] 원격근무가 처음이라면 2020.03.07
328 어떤 ‘코로나 서사’를 쓸 것인가 (황정아) 2020.03.07
327 청소년 기후 행동 2020.03.14
326 [왜냐면] 나! ‘코로나19 바이러스’ / 김정헌 2020.03.17
325 마르켈 총리의 코로나 사태 관련 담화 2020.03.20
324 포스트 코로나 교육 전환 - 원격수업운영 기준안을 보고 2020.03.28