Raising Successful Children
Raising Successful Children
By MADELINE LEVINE
Published: August 4, 2012
PHRASES like “tiger mom” and “helicopter parent” have made their way into everyday language. But does overparenting hurt, or help?
Related in Opinion
Room for Debate: Are Olympic Parents Supportive or Overbearing? (August 2, 2012)
While parents who are clearly and embarrassingly inappropriate come in for ridicule, many of us find ourselves drawn to the idea that with just a bit more parental elbow grease, we might turn out children with great talents and assured futures. Is there really anything wrong with a kind of “overparenting lite”?
Parental involvement has a long and rich history of being studied. Decades of studies, many of them by Diana Baumrind, a clinical and developmental psychologist at the University of California, Berkeley, have found that the optimal parent is one who is involved and responsive, who sets high expectations but respects her child’s autonomy. These “authoritative parents” appear to hit the sweet spot of parental involvement and generally raise children who do better academically, psychologically and socially than children whose parents are either permissive and less involved, or controlling and more involved. Why is this particular parenting style so successful, and what does it tell us about overparenting?
For one thing, authoritative parents actually help cultivate motivation in their children. Carol Dweck, a social and developmental psychologist at Stanford University, has done research that indicates why authoritative parents raise more motivated, and thus more successful, children.
In a typical experiment, Dr. Dweck takes young children into a room and asks them to solve a simple puzzle. Most do so with little difficulty. But then Dr. Dweck tells some, but not all, of the kids how very bright and capable they are. As it turns out, the children who are not told they’re smart are more motivated to tackle increasingly difficult puzzles. They also exhibit higher levels of confidence and show greater overall progress in puzzle-solving.
This may seem counterintuitive, but praising children’s talents and abilities seems to rattle their confidence. Tackling more difficult puzzles carries the risk of losing one’s status as “smart” and deprives kids of the thrill of choosing to work simply for its own sake, regardless of outcomes. Dr. Dweck’s work aligns nicely with that of Dr. Baumrind, who also found that reasonably supporting a child’s autonomy and limiting interference results in better academic and emotional outcomes.
Their research confirms what I’ve seen in more than 25 years of clinical work, treating children in Marin County, an affluent suburb of San Francisco. The happiest, most successful children have parents who do not do for them what they are capable of doing, or almost capable of doing; and their parents do not do things for them that satisfy their own needs rather than the needs of the child.
The central task of growing up is to develop a sense of self that is autonomous, confident and generally in accord with reality. If you treat your walking toddler as if she can’t walk, you diminish her confidence and distort reality. Ditto nightly “reviews” of homework, repetitive phone calls to “just check if you’re O.K.” and “editing” (read: writing) your child’s college application essay.
Once your child is capable of doing something, congratulate yourself on a job well done and move on. Continued, unnecessary intervention makes your child feel bad about himself (if he’s young) or angry at you (if he’s a teenager).
But isn’t it a parent’s job to help with those things that are just beyond your child’s reach? Why is it overparenting to do for your child what he or she is almost capable of?
Think back to when your toddler learned to walk. She would take a weaving step or two, collapse and immediately look to you for your reaction. You were in thrall to those early attempts and would do everything possible to encourage her to get up again. You certainly didn’t chastise her for failing or utter dire predictions about flipping burgers for the rest of her life if she fell again. You were present, alert and available to guide if necessary. But you didn’t pick her up every time.
You knew she had to get it wrong many times before she could get it right.
Thanks for starting this exchange. Reading the very insightful articles
by Elise and David is consistent with a New York Times article I read
today on successful parenting. See http://www.nytimes.com/2012/
Christine Finnan, Ph.D.
Teacher Education and Sociology and Anthropology
College of Charleston
|공지||교실 공동체 프롤로그||2010.11.11||39897|
|공지||이론과 실천 프롤로그||2010.11.11||15511|
|3424||1890 플레이보이 달력 사진||2013.01.17||78698|
|3423||18호 동인지 가안||2010.05.14||27235|
|3422||도시 커뮤니티 재생을 위한 시론 (최종)||2012.08.19||19459|
|3421||바퀴벌레 법칙 (하인리히의 법칙)||2011.04.15||18217|
|3419||생태 소박한 잔치상 메뉴||2012.09.29||13386|
|3418||An Imaginary Dialogue on Modernity 2.2||2015.01.09||12850|
|3417||행복한 순간의 리스트||2011.05.14||12791|
|3415||네덜란드 기후변화 판결,||2016.10.13||11515|
|»||Raising Successful Children||2012.08.08||11395|
|3411||지시문 영화들ㅡㅡ the wave + 탈핵+마을게임||2013.01.03||10521|
|3410||2004년 1학기 <질적 연구 방법론> 강의노트||2010.05.13||10325|
|3409||the U.N. Internet Governance Summit Actually Accomplish Anything?||2012.12.16||10150|