Field Trips Anywhere
CHO(HAN)Haejoang
Field Trips Anywhere
CHO(HAN)Haejoang

Beware of the High Cost of ‘Free’ Online Courses

조한 2013.03.27 08:05 조회수 : 3623

 
Subject: more article on MOOC
To: haejoang cho <haejoang@gmail.com>


http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/03/25/beware-of-the-high-cost-of-free-online-courses/?smid=tw-share



March 25, 2013, 5:04 pm

Beware of the High Cost of ‘Free’ Online Courses

That the acronym MOOCs rhymes with “nukes” seems apt. Massive open online courses, or MOOCs ? led by two profit-making start-ups, Coursera and Udacity, founded by entrepreneurial Stanford professors ? are a new disruptive force in education. Leading universities have scrambled to join or offer alternatives like edX, a collaboration of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Harvard University and others.

The MOOCs movement has been greeted with equal parts enthusiasm and angst. The MOOC champions predict a technology-fueled revolution in the distribution and democratization of high-quality education. The MOOC skeptics have a variety of qualms, but especially about what is lost in the retreat of face-to-face teaching ? a point eloquently made by Andrew Delbanco, a professor of American studies at Columbia University, in an article in the current New Republic, “MOOCs of Hazard.”

Michael A. Cusumano, a professor at the Sloan School of Management at M.I.T., raises a different issue in an essay published this week: the economics of MOOCs and the implications.

His article appears in Communications of the ACM, the monthly magazine of the Association for Computing Machinery, and he had circulated a version of it earlier to his M.I.T. colleagues. After reading it, L. Rafael Rief, M.I.T.’s president, asked Mr. Cusumano to serve on a task force on the “residential university” of the future, including online initiatives.

“My fear is that we’re plunging forward with these massively free online education resources and we’re not thinking much about the economics,” Mr. Cusumano said in an interview.

The MOOC champions, Mr. Cusumano said, are well-intentioned people who “think it’s a social good to distribute education for free.”

But Mr. Cusumano questions that assumption. “Free is actually very elitist,” he said. The long-term future of university education along the MOOC path, he said, could be a “few large, well-off survivors” and a wasteland of casualties.

Mr. Cusumano’s concerns grow out of his study of the software and media industries in the face of price pressure from free, open-source software and digital distribution over the Internet. Two-thirds of the public companies in the software industry disappeared between 1998 and 2006, as companies failed or were acquired. In the media world, Mr. Cusumano contends that newspaper and magazine companies ? including The New York Times Company ? made a strategic mistake by giving away their publications free on the Web. The online pay walls that publications have since put up, he said, seem to be helping to stabilize things, but only after a precipitous decline.

Give-away pricing in education, Mr. Cusumano warns, may well be a comparable misstep. The damage would occur, he writes in the article, “if increasing numbers of universities and colleges joined the free online education movement and set a new threshold price for the industry ? zero ? which becomes commonly accepted and difficult to undo.”

In our conversation, I offered the obvious counterargument. Why should education necessarily be immune from this digital, Darwinian wave, when other industries are not? Isn’t this just further evidence of the march of disruptive progress that ultimately benefits society?

Mr. Cusumano has heard this reasoning before, and he is unconvinced. In the article, he explains, “I am mostly concerned about second- and third-tier universities and colleges, and community colleges, many of which play critical roles for education and economic development in their local regions and communities.”

“In education,” Mr. Cusumano adds, “‘free’ in the long run may actually reduce variety and opportunities for learning as well as lessen our stocks of knowledge.”

Later he writes: “Will two-thirds of the education industry disappear? Maybe not, but maybe! It is hard to believe that we will be better off as a society with only a few remaining megawealthy universities.”

목록 제목 날짜 조회수
공지 교실 공동체 프롤로그 2010.11.11 39954
공지 이론과 실천 프롤로그 2010.11.11 15555
2648 한명 대졸 3억 896만원 2013.04.12 2449
2647 세계를 다니며 같이 춤 추기 2013.04.10 2297
2646 지시문 관련 조경원 secret 2013.04.09 0
2645 세대차이 2013.04.09 2665
2644 국제대 학제 개편 secret 2013.04.05 0
2643 팀 브라운의 창의력과 놀이, 평가적 태도 2013.03.28 2973
» Beware of the High Cost of ‘Free’ Online Courses 2013.03.27 3623
2641 삼각산 재미난 마을 (3분 3초) 2013.03.24 2904
2640 수가타 미트라: 구름 속에 학교를 짓다 2013.03.24 2855
2639 알랭 드 보통의 글로벌 인생학교 secret 2013.03.21 0
2638 WWYD_ Child With Autism Insulted By Customer (Korean Sub) 2013.03.21 2830
2637 자공공 아카데미 2기 file 2013.03.20 2472
2636 자공공 아카데미 2기 file 2013.03.20 3636
2635 youtube mcferrrine 2013.03.16 2258
2634 youtube 솔라 마마스 2013.03.15 3299
2633 youtube 파쿠르 2013.03.15 2797
2632 sports for sharing fair play 2013.03.12 3275
2631 마이크로 임팩트 초대장 secret 2013.03.09 0
2630 자공공 첫강의 2013.03.04 3273
2629 자공공 함께 볼 동영상 2013.03.02 3201