AI 실험을 잠시 멈추자는 공개서한
AI실험의 속도를 늦추자, 6개월이라도 숨고르고 상황 분석하면서 가자고.
AI systems with human-competitive intelligence can pose profound risks to society and humanity, as shown by extensive research and acknowledged by top AI labs. As stated in the widely-endorsed Asilomar AI Principles, Advanced AI could represent a profound change in the history of life on Earth, and should be planned for and managed with commensurate care and resources. Unfortunately, this level of planning and management is not happening, even though recent months have seen AI labs locked in an out-of-control race to develop and deploy ever more powerful digital minds that no one – not even their creators – can understand, predict, or reliably control.
Contemporary AI systems are now becoming human-competitive at general tasks, and we must ask ourselves: Should we let machines flood our information channels with propaganda and untruth? Should we automate away all the jobs, including the fulfilling ones? Should we develop nonhuman minds that might eventually outnumber, outsmart, obsolete and replace us? Should we risk loss of control of our civilization? Such decisions must not be delegated to unelected tech leaders. Powerful AI systems should be developed only once we are confident that their effects will be positive and their risks will be manageable. This confidence must be well justified and increase with the magnitude of a system's potential effects. OpenAI's recent statement regarding artificial general intelligence, states that "At some point, it may be important to get independent review before starting to train future systems, and for the most advanced efforts to agree to limit the rate of growth of compute used for creating new models." We agree. That point is now.
Therefore, we call on all AI labs to immediately pause for at least 6 months the training of AI systems more powerful than GPT-4. This pause should be public and verifiable, and include all key actors. If such a pause cannot be enacted quickly, governments should step in and institute a moratorium.
AI labs and independent experts should use this pause to jointly develop and implement a set of shared safety protocols for advanced AI design and development that are rigorously audited and overseen by independent outside experts. These protocols should ensure that systems adhering to them are safe beyond a reasonable doubt. This does not mean a pause on AI development in general, merely a stepping back from the dangerous race to ever-larger unpredictable black-box models with emergent capabilities.
AI research and development should be refocused on making today's powerful, state-of-the-art systems more accurate, safe, interpretable, transparent, robust, aligned, trustworthy, and loyal.
In parallel, AI developers must work with policymakers to dramatically accelerate development of robust AI governance systems. These should at a minimum include: new and capable regulatory authorities dedicated to AI; oversight and tracking of highly capable AI systems and large pools of computational capability; provenance and watermarking systems to help distinguish real from synthetic and to track model leaks; a robust auditing and certification ecosystem; liability for AI-caused harm; robust public funding for technical AI safety research; and well-resourced institutions for coping with the dramatic economic and political disruptions (especially to democracy) that AI will cause.
Humanity can enjoy a flourishing future with AI. Having succeeded in creating powerful AI systems, we can now enjoy an "AI summer" in which we reap the rewards, engineer these systems for the clear benefit of all, and give society a chance to adapt. Society has hit pause on other technologies with potentially catastrophic effects on society. We can do so here. Let's enjoy a long AI summer, not rush unprepared into a fall.
|332||나의 페미니즘, 창조적 공동체를 살다/살리||2023.05.24||13|
|329||별꼴 소년들과 함께 할 영화 인문학||2023.05.13||27|
|328||페미니즘 고전 읽기||2023.04.30||55|
|327||"챗GPT 사전에 ‘모른다’는 없다" (중앙일보 04292023)||2023.04.30||42|
|326||우리 동네 중딩과 함께 놀고 배우고||2023.04.22||53|
|325||황윤 감독의 신작 <수라> 관객이 만드는 시사회||2023.04.22||121|
|324||중딩 모임 이름은 <바람이 불어오는 곳>||2023.04.22||27|
|323||무문관을 지나며 -강신주 강의||2023.03.31||68|
|322||어린이 선흘 마을 예술 학교 4/17-5/3 월수금||2023.03.31||106|
|»||AI 실험을 잠시 멈추자는 공개서한||2023.03.31||37|
|320||탐라 도서관 강의||2023.03.24||43|
|319||연대 치대 강의 ppt||2023.03.14||82|
|318||부산 건강마을센터 강의 ppt||2023.03.14||52|
|317||정경일 선생의 사회적 영성 탐구||2023.03.02||61|
|316||discontent of democracy 추천의 글||2023.03.01||38|
|315||정당성 위기에서 재정 위기로||2023.02.24||58|
|314||자본주의와 민주주의는 동행 가능한가 -슈트렉 서평||2023.02.24||64|
|313||책소개 금융자본주의의 폭력||2023.02.24||22|
|312||수주 박형규 목사 탈춤 예수전||2023.02.11||43|
|311||2월 번개 영화관 <안녕, 소중한 사람>||2023.02.11||55|
|310||상큼한 컬럼 하나 <상냥함에 물들기>||2023.02.10||54|
|309||탐라도서관 3월 강의 주제||2023.02.01||64|
|308||10세 두명을 위한 인문학 실험 교실||2023.02.01||59|
|307||3주간 그린 그림 정리||2023.02.01||63|
|306||작심 3일로 끝난 일기, M의 일기로 대체||2023.02.01||58|
|304||1월 21 토, 22 일||2023.01.24||59|
|302||사피엔스 캠프 2- 소년의 성년||2023.01.20||47|
|300||권력과 사랑에 대하여 -조민아 책에서||2023.01.18||58|
|299||코올리나 13에서 15일||2023.01.16||37|
|298||코올리나 일지 둘쨋날||2023.01.15||44|
|297||글방 전성시대 (어딘 김현아)||2023.01.14||45|
|296||또문의 새해, 부지런한 글쓰기||2023.01.14||51|
|294||또문 1월 편지||2023.01.14||35|
|293||Dall-e가 그린 시니어 페미니스트 그림||2023.01.14||39|